Trial Court Grants Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity in IAS v. Microsoft

Klarquist Sparkman, LLP attorneys helped our client Microsoft Corporation prevail on summary judgment of patent invalidity in a January 3, 2008 ruling by Judge Dee Benson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah.  A copy of the Court's decision can be found here.

 

The case against Microsoft was filed in the District of Utah in February 2006 by International Automated Systems, Inc. ("IAS").  IAS alleged that Microsoft’s fingerprint readers infringed the asserted patent, U.S. Patent No. 5,598,474.  The Court later consolidated the case against Microsoft with another case where IAS asserted the same patent against Digital Persona, Inc.  IAS has also asserted the patent against IBM, Lenovo and UPEK, Inc. in a separate case still pending in the District of Utah.

 

Microsoft and Digital Persona filed their motion for summary judgment of invalidity in May 2007.  In granting the motion, the Court held all claims of the asserted patent invalid for failure to comply with three patentability requirements:  enablement, written description, and regards as the invention.  

 

Microsoft was represented by Microsoft attorney Isabella Fu, Klarquist attorney John Vandenberg, and former Klarquist attorney, Jared Goff, now with Goff Patent Law.

 

Digital Persona was represented by Ed Taylor and Lester Vincent of Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, LLP.



Back to Headlines News



Advanced Search | Search Professionals

Klarquist Sparkman, LLP

One World Trade Center 121 S.W. Salmon Street Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon   97204 503-595-5300 phone
503-595-5301 fax